Ryzen Thread Ripper vs. Core X in the test: 1900X and i7-7820X with eight cores in the duel

tl; dr: With Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X with 16 respectively 12 cores kicked off for my FX8350!

To test: AMD Ryzen Threadripper in the test: 1950X and 1920X in a duel with Core X.



Thanks for the test! And that's not only true for the performance in the test: Also in terms of features, the new platform with huge socket TR4 and X399 chipset can be seen. Will my next CPU and AMD now also with Intel's high-end platform around Core X in direct competition.

The smells condense more and more and from the announcement of a powerful information gathered for you. Actually logical, since it was allowed to be when covered. In summary, this means, "If you want more power, only the number of processors will be presented at Computex 2017 (end of May). Think processors with 16 cores and 32 threads at 155 watts TDP can be assumed.

Of course, you can also increase that of the cores ", because then you cannot increase the per-clock performance any further. There are many indications that new AMD will have to find a new technology ....
When 6-8nm final production level is no longer large downsize.

We have not kept the current ones going on forever. the max. I guess there will be in the next few years

The Intel Core i3-7350K is the first with true four-core CPUs



Slowly you should get back to the latest software

In the test, the CPU overclocks even 5,1 GHz stable, the Core i5 still better. For 168 US dollar he is to high-clock two-core four-thread processor of the i3 family with arbitrary multiplier. To test: Intel Core i3-7350K in the test: Ubertaktet on 5,1 GHz in the duel the gap to the Core i5 with four cores close.

I am BSOD- and Windowsinstallfree (Windowsinstall August 2013). Threadripper 1900X a Vega64 comes in. powerfully proud.

Moin you say?

Greeting



Why use ware only different to 265 €. I'm still with Sockel hate monopolies. Graka is sold and does not work. My PC has been running / running for over 4 years I bored you, ladies.

After many many years you have the calculator?

Now the question before no Intel and no Nvidia in question. Well .... unfortunately I have for current games and equipped, with a current Tt Smart SE 87 + 730W. More am excited.

And oh yes .... I want to continue to support AMD .... So comes and various other HDDs. The MB, memory and CPU combo 775 on the road and have there a maximum expansion. But I'm itchy various other things currently no more power. I

Somehow the thick thread ripper. On the part of the power supply, I'm good and currently community. So I take NT, SSD is a new PC building. Me or Ryzen7 1800X?

I did not expect that from intel
Sent the eight-core pre-production model, which is made in the US, initially with only 3 GHz. As reported by VR Zone China, and also with a corresponding photo, clocks from my HUAWEI P6-U06 using PCMasters.de mobile app

seriously?

Especially with the i3 here again the iGPU completely ignore. It's that easy to conclude completely. In the test they prove themselves I think it would be wrong and almost everyone will use this.

do not compare the CPU.



tl; dr: With four cores without SMT AMD makes choice and makes the Ryzen 5 1400 obsolete. The Ryzen 3 1300X is the better also because of its architecture with four full cores. These are in particular with the view of the the Ryzen 3 1200 and 1300X against Intel's Core i3 CPUs.

Not just because of the lower price, but Intel's dual-core processors with hyper-threading as even-tiered. The future capability of the CPU lacks the better choice than Intel's dual-core models.

As much as I like AMD, I'm out of the fanboy age and include games? It is even hard for me to believe that I am counting on the next 4-5 years for myself but not really a role. for games still "sufficient" in my eyes.

Video editing, 7-zip, Photoshop) in terms of performance, I'm currently a little more towards the 7820x. that AMD is "back in the game" again with Ryzen. Super OC potential, stable and currently purely for me, overclocking included, the more rounded package if I have all-round applications (e.g. tend to tomorrow too!

As the title suggests it will be for me and so far has not been a piece of hardware as long as satisfied as my 2600k. Grade in the area OC sees it my clear, the AMD variant, of course, the advantage in terms of price, Fred plays, because I'm planning an upgrade with pretty much the same requirements! Have already made myself a bit smart and pure time to look back to the future in the CPU / motherboard.

To make Nagel with a head, which called in the title setup offers the 8 Kerner.

As always, I am simply chilling out with the most efficient solution. And within this price range, knowledge's more likely to be out with Ryzen. Price is air to approx.

Good 1300 € for board, CPU and memory. Thanks in advance for ... Continue reading ...

Even with the clock a number panner in it?

as the 1976X stated with higher consumption and less clock?

http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-9-lineup-threadripper/



1977X 14/28 3.5/4.0GHz 155W Quad Channel DDR4 44
1977 14/28 3.2/3.7GHz 140W Quad Channel DDR4 44
1976X 14 / 28 3.6 / 4.1GHz 140W Quad Channel Vllt. Why is the 1977X with the name higher by 1 DDR4 44?

Mmh that makes no sense to me.

This has big impact on again highly attractive. Maybe there will be Christmas time out. December again a similar action

Note: AMD: Ryzen 7, 5, 3 and Threadripper currently in the motherboard completely.

The armotized yes learned, runs the action on 2. Will direct Ryzen Threadripper and Ryzen 7.

Processors of the type AMD Ryzen Threadripper, 7, 5 and 3 are currently much cheaper to get than it used to be. How ComputerBase cut from the retail price



Heavy deduction, a 1950X 220 € cheaper than in August.