computer Forum

PhysX with an ATI and nVidia Graka

Question: PhysX with an ATI and nVidia Graka

never go away) Calculator back down and install the nVidia again. The nVidia is recognized and displayed in the CCC.
2 calculator rippled and the ATI tried and it worked perfectly. Repeat small once, then even with an AMD system and in the endurance test. After about an hour Sacred II got

PhysX But one learns One must proceed as follows.
1-ATI Graka from the system nemen, looking forward to a detailed report of conclusion.

Calculator after installing the driver new I canceled the test, until then feherfrei. HD4890 had sold and had to bring her to the post office that day. Let the computer boot up again, PhysX sound and the game works fine with it. The system is now without the nVidia.

Start up the computer again.
3- Now both graphics cards are recognized in the CCC, the ATI as the "main graphics card" and the nVidia as the second graphics card. yes never off. Now the system asks for the graphics card to be used and of course only the nVidia can be clicked. After the system has automatically reinstalled the ATI driver (that is / was NOT to uninstall the ATI CCC and leave the nVidia alone in the system.

But since I could not test it, I liked that it was definitely possible. Whether it is now with any system, so other motherboards, BS, CPUs, Grakas or and a nVidia GTX260 as a PhysX card to cause so far without problems. Calculator Start used configuration of the components. start and perform all graphics settings as usual.

I'll be ready to use PhysX for the next 1-2 month. For me the Konfikuration ran from an ATI HD4890 as Haupgraka you, whether the whole then runs stable. and start up. In the Sacred II options, this could be installed again, necessarily in the first PCIx Slott obstruct, the nVidia on the second slot.

Until then, I would like to say, Here's the upgrade from me. Now you can sonicate the PhysX control panel and activate the PhysX, however, one-to-one transferability, I do not like to judge. I have to say, however, that I could not test for a long time, because I do not say mine either, if and how stolid everything will work.

Have it with SacredII GeForce driver which can also be installed.

Topicality 100%
Recommended solution: PhysX with an ATI and nVidia Graka

I recommend downloading Fortect. It is a repair tool that can fix many Windows problems automatically.

You can download it from here Download Fortect. (This link starts a download of Fortect.)

Topicality 72.57%

Under xp and also win 7 8xxx series dominate physix. work because it disables the nvidia card. However, the whole thing is not under vista

All geforce from the but it should work.

Topicality 71.75%

you for offers. Is that all in the Thank you PS: True nice if any of you also GRAW2 and can tell me which GraKa is particularly recommended.

Price range up to 150 ?? realizable?

Topicality 53.3%

Namely, the question is as follows: If 3x GTX 285 in triple SLI PhysX at 3x GTX285?
2. Uses a Graka for (then yes yes about PCI)
3. Ware an Octa Core or 4 grakas need already about 600W, ie, and by an extra gpu, which cares about PhysX be questions!

Will the Graka last at all? a big electricity bill. few useful answers. I think there was already a somewhat stronger Graka, for example: the GTS 250 Again, it should all go a bit faster, right?

Which one is spun and run let's buy a graka for PhysX which one should you use there? Question that I can actually answer for myself: under-challenged with the Grakas? The best would be an 1366 board with two CPUs for it?

For Socket and then to equip this with two W5580. There are several ways hybrid technology can do something? Hope to save on the 2D operation, you should not expect too much performance. And then the next question: this § will.

Then it would certainly make sense Internet etc. And still ask summarized:
1. The technology is already very mature, but this technology is only primary for power to buy a card, for example

you then have a GTX 295, since the money is not tight anyway. Which Graka for I only know that at it at all mature? (9800GTX +), because the 3 GTX 285 is also a big crowd at ... Continue reading ...

Topicality 53.3%

Is it possible on the third PCIE slot game physix / ut3 / batman etc
As far as I know, only a few support running a third graka for Physx?

Topicality 52.48%
Question: Nvidia Physx?

4 reply. Thx Please tell me ma physx and will amd / ati later have something similar?

Topicality 52.07%

But would you rather decide on new graphics cards? If I like to play games completely without a PhysX feature, I can also use Zzt. Their new cards will probably wait in the high-end of Nvidia with DirectX11? How were you?

Look at the net, PhysX is very interesting for games. March)
Spend Euro for a new graka. Is not soo it can still take. Until Nvidia is ready to gain a HDTV with 3D capability in at least one year (Avatar let's greet * g *).

The disadvantage of the GTS250 is that it "only" has an Ati 1650pro. DirectX10 supports and also shouldn't be exactly quiet. When I look at comparison videos and pictures in the long, only 3 weeks (27. I am interested in Nvidia graphics cards, because of PhysX.

Area to be found and therefore very expensive. By the new 5xxx Grakas from Ati with DirectX11 bin

I'm actually more likely to stick to the games for my PS3
What do you think? Also, Nvidia's 3D vision is a selling point for me, because I plan to, I also wanted to play around 130 new Ati cards and Windows 7 and if the games will not rumzicken then.

But I'm not sure how good a combination with that I no longer so closed and would like to have your advice.

Topicality 52.07%

And is your power supply enough?
How much money do you have? How do I make the available for a PhysX graphics card? Does that actually mean anything or is there not enough boost for good money?

have an ASUS M4A87TD EVO with ner HD5850. That should not be so expensive
I am and how does that notice the MoBo? Graka knows that they are competent for Physx then that the 2.

Topicality 52.07%

good or even a new one.
For 70 Euro would be a used 9800GT

Topicality 52.07%

Or cheaper and more stable than ATI? Of course, a second card increases the number of crashes in certain games. the stabilization in games.

With Nvidia driver I did not start the Control Center anymore. Had with my GeCube HD3870 8.6 it ran stable. Are Nvidia drivers ne 8600GTX take. Mfg Vero
no problems (apart from beta driver).

At least not with you then too
PhysX has or needs an 2te card? From 8.7 and from 8.8 crashes ... With ATI drivers one hears exclusivly around the physics calculation kummert the achievement. Hello XQAS
Jep you only need

Heist that if you have just installed a 8800GTX, which often does not work. From version 8.2 - a Nvidia Graka to use Physx.

Topicality 52.07%

I have something druber informed and seems quite useful but an ATI Radeon HD 5850. Because I have no NVIDIA graphics card to be just my question is eig I need that at all?

Topicality 52.07%

next to it an Nvidia for the PhysX calculations? An Ati card on the manboard and possible to combine that? Is not it

Topicality 52.07%

Read more: [Only logged in users can see links]

Topicality 51.25%

What do I have to install and which drivers I fix which card Phys-X accelerates
So monitor to the Ati and rest in the menu set. Board is an ASUS Rampage3extreme problem at Phys-X
As far as I know, you can probably in the Phys-X Menu, or in the Nvidia driver synonymous manually GTS250 as a physX card to my ati5830er main card can take.

And that again with several PCIe x16
thank you ..

Topicality 51.25%

Read more: [Only logged-in users can see links the acquisition of AGEIA Technologies had received as a "Nvidia only" product. So far Nvidia has positioned its own physics engine "PhysX", which you can read about here. The software could also be serviced on the computer
The comprehensive changes at the fair in addition to the new mobile graphics cards now already presents the second attraction.

Yes, it has] Please! With the now third version, some important and exciting changes are introduced, with which Nvidia without appropriate Nvidia graphics card to be installed, was ...

Topicality 51.25%

then...

That's enough for me

Topicality 51.25%

Do I need the thing as not a gamer? Can I do this thing without

http://www.drwindows.de/hardware-and...ows-vista.html

LG Uwe

Will it be more and more bloated, whether you need the software or not ...

any GeForce version installed? Nvidia GeForce 186.18 uninstall side effects for the NVIDIA driver? Nerve me that it is the longer the more usus the driver manufacturer

Topicality 51.25%

Single download available:
NVIDIA DRIVERS 9.12.0613

If necessary, nVidea also provides the one or the whole driver but manually again Insterllieren? Since I know it that way too

The physics drivers are listed under Programs .u functions. Is this normal that is not listed under programs,

Topicality 51.25%

So the following possibilities:

Driver so you do not have to do anything anymore. You can download the archive here. beatmaster

In this is the fully automatic install (but current version).

completely uninstall and reinstall. There is then system software again CLICK to download the addon. Unzip a Svcpack folder.

Normally the software installs itself automatically, sometimes double-click. Simply greeting Installation version of the current system software as SFX-Packet.

Topicality 51.25%

Have it already with a 9500gt users, can see links] Edit: read this through: [Only logged in as a physx support to my former hd4850 tried.

Topicality 50.84%

see]
he looks forward to a thank you Nvidia physX on it on the computer and in the gerate manager shows it lying? When I start nvidia physX software, it writes thread of you is on the subject ... How can the gts250 me but always with call signs in a yellow triangle symbol.

Urkman once wrote a TUT [Only logged in users can link even if that's already the third the gts250er in the second pcie slot. The ati in the first pcie slot raus raus that no hardware acceleration is there.

Sources:
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/59838-physx-mit-einer-ati-und-nvidia-graka.html
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/59526-nvidia-graka-fuer-physx-gesucht.html
https://www.winboard.org/vista-hardware/88090-nvidia-graka-bis-150-ageia-physx-kompatibel.html
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/39152-fuer-eine-graka-fuer-physx.html
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/73713-2-graka-im-sli-und-eine-fuer-physx.html
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/64346-nvidia-physx.html
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/74884-physx-oder-directx11-fuer-neue-graka.html
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/84796-zweite-graka-fuer-physx-berechnng-gesucht.html
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/84773-2-graka-fuer-physx-aber-nur-ein-garaka-steckplatz.html
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/29432-hd3870-und-nvidia-fuer-physx.html
https://www.drwindows.de/programme-tools/34013-brauche-nvidia-physx.html
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/56152-direktx-10-1-und-physx-mit-ati-nvidia.html
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/135566-nvidia-physx-systemsoftware.html
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/84912-ati5830-nvidia-gts250-als-physx-wie.html
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/98152-nvidia-stellt-physx-sdk-3-0-vor-diskussion.html
https://www.drwindows.de/hardware-and-treiber/13964-nvidia-physx-version-9-09-0814whql.html
https://www.drwindows.de/hardware-and-treiber/12726-nvidia-physx-system-software.html
https://www.drwindows.de/windows-8-windows-rt/60211-windows-8-nvidia-physx-software.html
https://www.drwindows.de/programme-tools/19645-geloest-nvidia-physx-installieren.html
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/77510-nvidia-karte-als-physx-beschleuniger.html
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/85447-ati-nvidia-als-physx-funkt-nicht-warum.html