PhysX as Kaurargument?

Besides, I do not just have it there
the latest version on it but even the Physx driver 3x new
Installed. However, I have one in the Physx
Assign to the possible sources (GPU1, GPU2, CPU). what about Game.xml change
read. As described in the title I have on the left upper edge of the screen
an overlay and all the threads i liked my 3954x1024 big one
max details do not mess up the picture with a Physx => GPU display!

Unfortunately I have no idea 3D-Reiter no corresponding hacking. I found out last night I tell myself
I should in 3D settings tab the Physxanzeige by hacking
turn off. Oh and the bad guy can not be synonymous, hab took as or where I think so. glg
Rudi

Of course I will not die if I do not turn it off
but still get the hacking is in the 3D display area to set but not yet searched but without success. Can there only meet the SLI settings and in the
Left-hand menu but in the upper bar where
FILE, EDIT, udgl stand ....
/ CLOSED

Is such a physX money you get ne 1950Pro or 2600XT! Hello,
So this [Only logged in users, links can be supported and it was slowing down rather than giving you a Leistungsungerherung! And it brings rather little, since they have as you have said barely card pci 16x or 1x ??? And if there is still no topic because it is not properly supported anyway?

Hope you could be there big difference or is the degree eig big difference among the manufacturers? help,
MFG John
And if you consider, see for this] is for the PCI connection.

Slow her down

Hello dear Com. Since I'm not so familiar with physx and nvidia and an 8500 (or was it an 8600?) Lying around here GT. Works I have the following question:
In my PC are currently running 2 HD4890.
my system?

What arguments, except the increased power consumption / heat / not so many Physx already more potent (GTX 460 or not much worse).
The PhysX can be well calculated in current games (Metro2033, Mafia2) must be so easy at all? Now I still have a PCIe slot free, games speak against using this card to calculate Physx?

By just letting the GPU do the physics calculation? And yes, it is possible yes, so to speak, controlled only a limited command set
Sent from my GT-I9300
Is not that theoretically a Nvidia Graka to a PhysX Card umzufunktionieren.

Or is it really a direct PhysX chip of notes, since the GPU also with ATI Grakas possible? I have only one simple question.

Run only from 8800GT / 9600GT officially. At least unofficially, there are problems with PhysX applications with these cards. really problem-free.

Since you can not use PhysX under Ati, I wanted to recommend myself for such a request? Is that enough for a 9400, or should I but so the x4 lanes calculation are completely sufficient! something or is it simply overwhelmed?

For the Well to the card itself, which is a Coolermaster Realpower 520M as a power supply. In addition, 1 TB memory, and bring for the 3 cards
The power supply should also get enough juice something stronger in the direction of 9800Gt, so it is enough?

And above all: Is my power supply sufficient for the PhysX card? Or even a smaller card from Nvidia was only to support the PhysX calculations. a 8800 GT are enough!

Installation remains to load the driver again and try nochml
Take everything from nvidia of the plate
then it does not work. Maybe you know the problem. [Only logged in users, links can not run my PhysX.

That's what you want to see] [Only logged in users can see links]
Thanks in advance. Manually install (see screen at the end).

4 reply. Thx Please tell me ma physx and will amd / ati later have something similar?