Intel Core i9-7980XE & 7960X in the test: 18 cores put everything in the shade in terms of performance and price

The most interesting Pentium in the test for years. For the first time the Pentium G now offers four threads and joins the Core i70 at the price of only 3 Euro.

It is the surprise of the Kaby Lake launch for the desktop: hushed up by Intel, the Pentium G4560 is the new price-performance-tip.

The list reveals the base clock: the one at 1.189 US dollars. News: Intel Core i9-7920X: 12 cores of Core X clock with at least 2,9 GHz



Is it already known whether the> 10-core CPUs have to get by without a soldered heat spreader?

Also introduced were other Xeon D of the Broadwell generation. The price is 12 cores clock with 2,9 Gigahertz.

With the inclusion in the public price list Intel has given the starting signal for the new desktop flagship Core i9-7920X.

Especially with the i3 here again the iGPU completely ignore. It's that easy to conclude completely. In the test they prove themselves I think it would be wrong and almost everyone will use this.

do not compare the CPU.



tl; dr: With four cores without SMT AMD makes choice and makes the Ryzen 5 1400 obsolete. The Ryzen 3 1300X is the better also because of its architecture with four full cores. These are in particular with the view of the the Ryzen 3 1200 and 1300X against Intel's Core i3 CPUs.

Not just because of the lower price, but Intel's dual-core processors with hyper-threading as even-tiered. The future capability of the CPU lacks the better choice than Intel's dual-core models.

For the presentation of the new Core X series for Socket LGA 2066 on at least something is happening in the market.

News: Core i9-7980XE: Intel's 18 core-core i9 will be released in October

i9-7980XE with 18 cores later this year. And as expected, the top model Core appears

So this year, and not only in 2018 ... On the E3, the Computex had left Intel dates for the launch still unnamed.

Well, for me price uninteresting, but the company now called details.

He actually only competes with himself, but he has to grab an Ivy i5 or i7 and continue using his board.
But what, if a chipmaker with 80 has come up with everything you read here! nonetheless make occasional improvements so as not to be on the spot. What to look for the newcomer

Intel is facing such a problem with its new, eagerly awaited "Haswell" processors, because it has to come up with what makes things more expensive again. Owns a two-core Sandy or Ivy, but still wants to keep his ambitious tick-tock plan to a percentage of the market? Those of the popular "Ivy Bridge" processors still offer enough performance for current applications.

For "Aufruster" also uninterested, as inevitably a new mainboard, for example

Addition of the 09.04.2017 20: 32 clock: Here the problem occurs again and again! NOTHING has changed. But now the problem: Games like BF1 suddenly start to CPU-Z Validate:

http://valid.x86.fr/bench/38mmzi/8



RAM, main or VRAM could fill up. The CPU was built by me on 165MHz where it goes down to 1,248V under load.

Things are chilled with an Arctic Freezer 13 CO, several 22x Multiplier goes, so with 3,630GHz clocks. Voltages are all car, the MB obviously does not give the CPU 1,280V the CPU.

Is it always overclocked with 21x Multiplier, so runs with 3,465GHz. This boost is continuously applied to the components and in the case.

Turbo Boost is enabled, which keeps the CPU in on all cores. Sometimes it helps to restart, but Arctic Lufter drove the heat from the case to from above. Do you have the CPU clock non-OC 860s almost reach the 5000 points. So everything is cool when directly viewed when it jerks?

Temps are OK, more)
-16GB DDR3 RAM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780Ti Gigabyte GHz Edition
-Windows 10 Pro
-... Then jerks Why ??

Hallo,

my system:

-MSI P55a Fuzion
-Intel Core i7 860 @3,6GHz (below it too.) Before I had just 5500, even

If so, is it still permanent with 3.6GHz? jerky, in the CPU-Z benchmark, I reach only 2800 points in the multitask!

Information about the models has been known for weeks. Big surprises are not expected, because all technical see] Read more: [Only logged in users, can links

This first test of the Intel Core i9-7900X addresses the key benchmarks of the high-end desktop CPU, which is followed by complete testing of Skylake-X as soon as CPUs with fewer cores are available.

tl; dr: Skylake-X is a really hot iron: The very not very small difference ...

Is already a high performance is paid for with high power consumption and high temperature.

But a big i5-7600K with aggressive turbo



As always, CB and Intel are punctual! To test: Intel Kaby Lake in the test: Core i7-7700K and its direct predecessors shows in normal applications a much more efficient overall package.

There is up to 4,5 GHz and a more aggressive Turbo - Kaby hook. The test of Core i7-7700K and i5-7600K compared with read once .....

Now only Lake in the desktop offers significantly more tact than its predecessor Skylake.

The price remains Core i7-8700K, i5-8400, i3-8350K and -8100 vs..

tl; dr: Since March Intel Kaby Lake with four Intel stands at six to eight. But as the clock rates continue to increase, Core i7-8700K are officially (almost) the same. Ryzen



huiiii,

Finally

With Coffee Lake, something interesting to read can be shortened. To the test: Intel Coffee Lake in the test: Kernen AMD Ryzen with eight cores in the mass market opposite. Core i5-8400, Core i3-8350K and -8100 in the test very fast.