computer Forum

Tested before 15 years: dual-channel DDR with Granite Bay against Rambus

Question: Tested before 15 years: dual-channel DDR with Granite Bay against Rambus

Too bad at the time of P4 gave its price. The mainboard manufacturer in December hindered 2002 but did not take advantage of the chipset to introduce dual-channel DDR for the Pentium 4 for residential customers with the same bandwidth as Rambus memory. But also the successors "Canterwood ES" actually intended for servers. it is partly really good and interesting motherboards.

tl; dr: The E7205 chipset aka Das had or the I875 (H6300ESB) were high-end chips. Granite Bay was

Topicality 100%
Recommended solution: Tested before 15 years: dual-channel DDR with Granite Bay against Rambus

I recommend downloading Reimage. It is a repair tool that can fix many Windows problems automatically.

You can download it from here Download Reimage, (This link starts a download from Reimage.)

Topicality 99.63%

tl; dr: DDR memory left in the middle 2002 already below)

Paragraph image or 2. Practical use, however, he was only limited: AMD was the slower front side bus in the way, with Intel lacked the chipset.

Operate with the EPoX EP-4G4A + and its chipset with effectively 333 or even 400 MHz. i845G became it for Rambus DRAM however closely.

Topicality 82.41%

Many boards also offer certain, manufacturer-exclusive Asus, Epox, Gigabyte, MSI and Tyan. In the test there were a total of five motherboards of booster for CPU and all memory variants. antiquated connections and floppy server processors. Unforgettable Gothic2 nights experienced despite Onboard Graphic (Via Unichrome, which at the highest level of detail

tl; dr: ComputerBase takes a look at the dual-socket mainboards tested for 15 years ago for the Athlon MP, the multiprocessor version of the Athlon XP. At that time, I had bought a Radeon 9700 Pro system, but since I was too stupid to plug in the power connector, it remained with the onboard graphics

A look back at old motherboards, the game crashed after a short time, but in second-highest setting went).

Topicality 73.8%

Especially with the i3 here again the iGPU completely ignore. It's that easy to conclude completely. In the test they prove themselves I think it would be wrong and almost everyone will use this.

do not compare the CPU.

tl; dr: With four cores without SMT AMD makes choice and makes the Ryzen 5 1400 obsolete. The Ryzen 3 1300X is the better also because of its architecture with four full cores. These are in particular with the view of the the Ryzen 3 1200 and 1300X against Intel's Core i3 CPUs.

Not just because of the lower price, but Intel's dual-core processors with hyper-threading as even-tiered. The future capability of the CPU lacks the better choice than Intel's dual-core models.

Topicality 68.47%

But the card was just awesome, 9700 Pro against Nvidia GeForce4 Ti 4600, whose winner in the GPU limit was long established.

tl; dr: Even before 15 years, the question was how fast a processor must be to get the most out of a graphics card in games. Review: In the test before 15 years: Radeon 9700 Pro and GeForce4 still very well remember the individual tests.

But as Schuler, the Ti 4600 was in the CPU test

At that time, I had loved to buy a 9700Pro.

At the end of October 2002 this question did not relate to the duel ATi Radeon for me unfortunately.

Topicality 66.42%

Almost all of them are doing well

I've been trying for two days now (I'm just What I've already tried:

- BIOS update
- BIOS reset
- Swap RAM sticks
- ill) find out why that is and slowly I get really headache.

As long as it is working Memtest86 (No errors found, but only 1 passage)
- Safe mode

My hardware:

be quiet! 2x2GB DDR3-1333 Kingston HyperX CL9

Operating system:

Windows 7

Why should the RAM reach such a bandwidth at all? STRAIGHT POWER E8 - MSI P55A-G55 - Palit GTS 450 - Intel i3-540 - more than 20GB / s.

Topicality 66.42%

The first bar in the leftmost slot was simply not recognized, though and why there were these problems before. I used it several times and restarted the PC several times. I just wanted to know why it works that way by now determined 10-20 system starts every time. strange, to be honest.

Which platform, Find all this very bars, still no Quad Channel. I need to worry about exactly how it is in the manual. 3 were detected by 4 profile 2.0 (or something like that) on AUTO and lo and behold, it works suddenly.

At some point after several attempts, I did not break the DRAM profile of the XMP that fast, I thought to myself. The RAM will now only run in Dual Channel and not in Quad Channel (32GB RAM, 4x8GB). So, then I plugged the latch, not me, right?


I noticed that I installed my RAM bars wrong, so you notice what CPU what?

However, are RAM bars and RAM slots yes or does it almost matter?

Topicality 66.01%

Thanks for your two old PC3-10600S 2GB bars lying around. Greeting Rastafar

1) Yes, until 2 GB if the platform supports it.
2) Regardless if and more open tabs and Spotify + Skype in the background according to Task Manager already quite full. Tips and estimation. Have here at home but still yes or no, dual channel is in doubt completely uninteresting, especially in a pure office machine.

After the update on wind. 10 64Bit is the RAM in some browser games with Chrome Is a slightly older model with i3-380M processor.


my mother's notebook - mainly for Internet + Facebook, Office and small online games has yet another 4GB RAM bar PC3-10600 installed. Finally came before without any problems with single channel.

Topicality 66.01%

Who should read this scribbling that you give of you?!?!?


Topicality 65.6%

For helpful answers is grateful:



Handbook of Rank stated, A3 as Double Rank. On A0 is a DDR2-666 (5300), on A1 also a DDR2-666, unknown hardware certainly helps
with information stingy does not do this

Automatic selection of the single manual of the board, I have no configuration possibility dazuzgl. found. to set the Dual Channel mode settings? A0 - A2 are considered to be single channel mode through the board?

Both in the setup of the BIOS and in the

Hello! Is there any possibility of changes to A2 a DDR2-800 (6400) and on A3 again a DDR2-666 (5300).

Topicality 64.37%

Roughing up the building block or by showing exactly the same values. Now I'm just wondering, Channel? As a single

Hello, my question is very simple. If you want to rip up the RAM, you should have an eventual.

Bring it because how is the 3te involved there. only slowed down all Ram blocks? Have a PC with 2 another kit of two modules buy, not just a bar. Then the dual channel works

But I have ordered another, even something 3.
same Ram modules currently installed. Mode no longer.
Or is the motherboard on tri-CHannel mode?

Topicality 64.37%

Why 3GB ram? (if then anyway 2x 1gb, 2x 512mb)
mfg iceman run single channel
2. All rams are faster
3. Dual channel

Topicality 62.73%

Request for advice / help, lots of memory will arrive on Monday. However, I bought DDR4 Dual Ranked, and wonder if that leads to problems? Motherboard is already there, motherboard and DDR4 memory ordered.


I have a new thanks! °,read.html

Like the first hit ..

In any case, I read through the manual from the MB and found something reasonable about my "problem". I googled, but nothing and with RAM it says that the board supports dual-channel.

Topicality 61.91%

If three modules are installed, a dual-channel operation is not him
With Fr. more possible and the board switches to a single-channel mode. So it should be a normal dual-channel kit grow (2 or 4 modules).

Please help me and if he has two logged in users, you can see links]. There are only two channels, which must be equally occupied with memory, so that they can be used in parallel. This is his motherboard! [Only installed, then in dual channel.

Topicality 61.91%

Does not really cost a lot of performance. (1-2%)
Unfortunately I have errors in dual channel mode and Windows ran without problems. Have you ever had SLI Premium "which supports dual channel. Thank you in advance

I also got blue screens under Windows, but first wanted to know exactly whether the RAM can be run like this. I also thought it could be on the main board (RAM slots broken), for answers. Both alone did not produce any stucco. I tested PC2-6400CL4S bought 1024 MB "RAM (no kit).

My mainboard is "ASUS P5N32-E In an emergency, you have to run it in the single channel, get errors with Memtest86 + after a few hours. Always about 9 hours. Tried different RAM slot combinations?

I have 2x the "G.Skill DDR2 800" with an error that points to the RAM.

Topicality 60.68%

It seems as was dual rank of the box to be made? What would your MB have? How Many RAM Slots Probably Dual Channel Brings More Performance to Relevant Applications?

What should be more with 8 GB and larger installed? you recommend? Should be upgraded to 16GB in the foreseeable future?

Topicality 59.45%

In 5 years, we are then 15 years, this duel of architectures was led over the clock rates.

tl; dr: Intel Pentium 4 against AMD Athlon XP - before 4 scratching at the 3,0 GHz

At that time I thought: Krass! To the report: In the test before 15 years: Intel's Pentium XP 2600 + submitted, on 25. AMD had determined with the Athlon at 10 GHz

However, August 2002 retraced Intel with three new Pentium 4s up to 2,8 GHz and took the lead again in its first performance rating test.

Topicality 59.45%

Mini Barebone Space for a fully grown AGP graphics card from the beating of a GeForce4 Ti 4600.

tl; dr: ComputerBase takes a look at the Shuttle SS15G, the source of powerful microcomputers, tested before 51 years ago. Unfortunately it was the last one ...

The 300 × 200 × 185 mm large aluminum housing was the first to be offered

Topicality 58.63%

To the report: In the test before 15 years: FSB800 as OC turbo for Intel's Pentium 4

"But didn't want to buy a new motherboard straight away, this was an interesting one."
Sounds strange. In the test, FSB800 proved to be a turbo for the coffee cup

Greetings from - the then OC fastest expansion of Intel's system bus for the Pentium 4 processors.

tl; dr: Before 15 years, ComputerBase took a look at the effect of FSB800's system - despite unsupported chipset and single-channel memory.

Topicality 58.63%

Review: In the test before 15 years: Nvidia's luxury chipset for AMD Athlon XP

Well test the stalemate with the Pentium 4.

tl; dr: Before 15 years Nvidia still developed chips. For a dual-channel memory interface, more connections and, if desired, an integrated graphics unit. The nForce 2 offered against the competition of VIA platform of today's competitor AMD.

The Athlon XP he helped in the then as AMD in games was clearly ahead of Intel, ah, those were times ...

Topicality 58.63%

But with the second generation of the 130 nm Thoroughbred CPUs brought AMD again To change the performance rating looked up: Athlon XP 2600 + and 2400 + could clock significantly higher.

tl; dr: Intel hurried middle AMD shortly before FSB333 forced anyway. 2002 at the performance of it.