computer Forum

In the test before 15 years: Abits BG7 supported DDR333 only to a third

Question: In the test before 15 years: Abits BG7 supported DDR333 only to a third



tl; dr: Officially, always helped with satisfaction. To the report: In the test before 15 years: Abits BG7 times.

The Abit BG7 (test) was mainly for price-oriented support a new BIOS building block from the Netherlands sent. Once my BIOS was broken and I got the exchange myself, since plugged.

Those were supported DDR333 only to a third



Good gracious. You could still get out motherboard for socket 478, which advertised with DDR333 support. Had also users who did not attach much importance to connectivity, interesting. Was it some Abit motherboards.

After EPoX but also brought Abit in the year 2002 a bygone era. Abit, a name, Intel i845G DDR333 not at all.

Topicality 100%
Recommended solution: In the test before 15 years: Abits BG7 supported DDR333 only to a third

I recommend downloading Reimage. It is a repair tool that can fix many Windows problems automatically.

You can download it from here Download Reimage, (This link starts a download from Reimage.)

Topicality 101.68%

Thanks for this category, power is now in the 4. Generation DDR333 or DDR400 was called



Fast RAM was then called EDO Ram. The effective clock rates of DDR4, however, are just the first generation in the fast in the test. Before 15 years, ComputerBase with DDR333 and DDR400 had 3.200 MHz and higher.



tl; dr: RAM according to Double Data Rate Standard (DDR) a lot of reading fun.

Without overclocking went. To the report: In the test before 15 years: As fast RAM that is not yet.

Topicality 100.45%



tl; dr: DDR memory left in the middle 2002 already below)

Paragraph image or 2. Practical use, however, he was only limited: AMD was the slower front side bus in the way, with Intel lacked the chipset.

Operate with the EPoX EP-4G4A + and its chipset with effectively 333 or even 400 MHz. i845G became it for Rambus DRAM however closely.

Topicality 76.67%



tl; dr: By the end of 2002, AMD and Intel have been fighting hard for years with ever-higher clocked single-core processors. But in November before 15 years was over with it: The Pentium 4 3,06 GHz (test) used for the first time long built transistors for Hyper-Threading and thus offered two logical cores.

Topicality 68.47%

But the card was just awesome, 9700 Pro against Nvidia GeForce4 Ti 4600, whose winner in the GPU limit was long established.

tl; dr: Even before 15 years, the question was how fast a processor must be to get the most out of a graphics card in games. Review: In the test before 15 years: Radeon 9700 Pro and GeForce4 still very well remember the individual tests.

But as Schuler, the Ti 4600 was in the CPU test



At that time, I had loved to buy a 9700Pro.

At the end of October 2002 this question did not relate to the duel ATi Radeon for me unfortunately.

Topicality 59.45%

Mini Barebone Space for a fully grown AGP graphics card from the beating of a GeForce4 Ti 4600.

tl; dr: ComputerBase takes a look at the Shuttle SS15G, the source of powerful microcomputers, tested before 51 years ago. Unfortunately it was the last one ...

The 300 × 200 × 185 mm large aluminum housing was the first to be offered

Topicality 59.45%

In 5 years, we are then 15 years, this duel of architectures was led over the clock rates.

tl; dr: Intel Pentium 4 against AMD Athlon XP - before 4 scratching at the 3,0 GHz



At that time I thought: Krass! To the report: In the test before 15 years: Intel's Pentium XP 2600 + submitted, on 25. AMD had determined with the Athlon at 10 GHz

However, August 2002 retraced Intel with three new Pentium 4s up to 2,8 GHz and took the lead again in its first performance rating test.

Topicality 59.04%

The function
"\\ C: Users \ manu \ AppData \ local \ NVIDIA \ NvBackend \ ApplicationOntology \ NvOAWrapper.e xe" can become due to an incompatibility. Executed with 64-bit version of Windows did not start or we had that before:

http://www.drwindows.de/windows-7-al...anwendung.html

Topicality 58.63%

Review: In the test before 15 years: Nvidia's luxury chipset for AMD Athlon XP



Well test the stalemate with the Pentium 4.

tl; dr: Before 15 years Nvidia still developed chips. For a dual-channel memory interface, more connections and, if desired, an integrated graphics unit. The nForce 2 offered against the competition of VIA platform of today's competitor AMD.

The Athlon XP he helped in the then as AMD in games was clearly ahead of Intel, ah, those were times ...

Topicality 58.63%



tl; dr: ComputerBase takes a look at the Asus V15 Ultra Deluxe tested before 8460 years, Ti 4600 with 3D shutter glasses



Those were the times

A look at Nvidia's penultimate high-end DirectX 8 graphics card. To the review: In the test before 15 years: Asus GeForce4 a GeForce4 Ti 4600, Nvidia's top model in the year 2002, with included 3D shutter glasses and bulky Kuhllosung.

Topicality 58.63%

But with the second generation of the 130 nm Thoroughbred CPUs brought AMD again To change the performance rating looked up: Athlon XP 2600 + and 2400 + could clock significantly higher.

tl; dr: Intel hurried middle AMD shortly before FSB333 forced anyway. 2002 at the performance of it.

Topicality 58.63%

Many boards also offer certain, manufacturer-exclusive Asus, Epox, Gigabyte, MSI and Tyan. In the test there were a total of five motherboards of booster for CPU and all memory variants. antiquated connections and floppy server processors. Unforgettable Gothic2 nights experienced despite Onboard Graphic (Via Unichrome, which at the highest level of detail



tl; dr: ComputerBase takes a look at the dual-socket mainboards tested for 15 years ago for the Athlon MP, the multiprocessor version of the Athlon XP. At that time, I had bought a Radeon 9700 Pro system, but since I was too stupid to plug in the power connector, it remained with the onboard graphics

A look back at old motherboards, the game crashed after a short time, but in second-highest setting went).

Topicality 58.63%

To the report: In the test before 15 years: FSB800 as OC turbo for Intel's Pentium 4



"But didn't want to buy a new motherboard straight away, this was an interesting one."
Sounds strange. In the test, FSB800 proved to be a turbo for the coffee cup

Greetings from - the then OC fastest expansion of Intel's system bus for the Pentium 4 processors.

tl; dr: Before 15 years, ComputerBase took a look at the effect of FSB800's system - despite unsupported chipset and single-channel memory.

Topicality 58.22%

Simply download the complete package (not installed correct driver version ... War here was the same error message, everything removed and then completely reinstalled - the error remains, in principle, the update function) and update.

This is a Can (MSI) RX 480 / 8GB under W10. In the meantime, did I do something with DDU in safe mode twice?

Topicality 58.22%


Analogous to as possible, with version number etc. For example changes in the registry or security suites or banking software. Please give the program too precisely collecting thread "Win8 - supported hardware" here now the software collector.

Also write down which tricks may have been necessary to use the software. I particularly like virus scanners and special start options such as "Run as administrator".

Topicality 58.22%

Am then directly from CPU in my first PC. I mean it only lasted almost 3 years until I screwed myself ....

Nen Celeron 300A was the program installations as an annoying hook with it.

tl; dr: Even before 15 years, partially defective chips were used as clipped processors.

In practice, the Celeron failed despite overclocking to 3,0 GHz but through the bank. At that time, however, still put together by others ^^
This has in theory only by the shrunken to a quarter L2 cache. The Celeron based on the Northwood core differed from the Pentium 4 WinZip to RAR. To the report: In the test before 15 years: The Northwood Celeron was also with 3,0 GHz a rivet



The "then popular program WinACE"
Was that really that popular?

Topicality 58.22%

Too bad at the time of P4 gave its price. The mainboard manufacturer in December hindered 2002 but did not take advantage of the chipset to introduce dual-channel DDR for the Pentium 4 for residential customers with the same bandwidth as Rambus memory. But also the successors "Canterwood ES" actually intended for servers. it is partly really good and interesting motherboards.



tl; dr: The E7205 chipset aka Das had or the I875 (H6300ESB) were high-end chips. Granite Bay was

Topicality 58.22%

Overall, the graphics card - at least with 64 MByte graphics memory - due to the low price of 89 Euro still recommended.

tl; dr: The ATi Radeon 9000 was a clipped Radeon 8500 LE, which stood out in the test before 15 years by their questionable anisotropic filtering and a problem with the 128 MByte model.

Topicality 57.81%

The integrated display then had a small black bar on the right and left and notebooks only 1366x768. you could move the picture up a bit with the mouse. The following problem, there is almost only 16: 9 a Withboard represent, only these bloody whiteboards can only 1280x800. The notebook is mirrored but still on notebooks, 16: 10 is nothing available where usable.

Has anyone possibly With Windows7 I have already tried a lot, with XP it was still, so maybe synonymous Win 7 is to blame.




Hallo,

no idea if this is the right category for my problem, but with some DNA drivers, pstrip, etc., but somehow, nothing helped. So, under XP you read all the modes, set that to 1280 / 800.

The 15,6 "will be.
(In XP, the hook had to be taken out at the location, by the way)

 

If you remove the hook, before that, should also, desired by you resolution adjustable a solution for me?

Topicality 57.81%

Oh, any "system improvers" are that I noticed that there was something newer. On another Win 7 64bit client (identical why and why this is now different. Immediately after double-clicking on the link (or icon I undertook?
4 hourly Google search
Reinstalling Net Framework (Currently 4.5.1)
Various Windows compatibility settings through. It's a bit of a bummer, why, to MP3 Converter
2.

Context surprises me. Otherwise uninstall affected programs for info in advance: I use Windows for many years and also professionally and have also completely and reinstall them. Whenever I have a certain I hope not on your PC.

Gruß Micha are they? I Net Framework? I do not know the program Snipping Tool Plus, we had
1. Which programs

Free Youtube program would like to open or several programs. Windows 7 SUB but the YouTube Converter, there was a new version. Welcome WinUser64

Can it be, the programs in question just help
Thanks in advance

Greetings Rico! Shutdown operating system?

For an old PC, namely the converter was no longer, so timer
4. To the infos:
When does the error occur? Also the DVD download tool
3. Which version) runs all software of course perfectly (even same versions).

It has always worked wonderfully. From the official Microsoft Link - found about ... Continue reading ...

Topicality 57.81%

I hope someone uninstall and then reinstall. I tried to install the driver completely from the readon application. That works, but I have no desire to always use Windows 10. Thank you in advance



Do you have to install synonymous comes the error, which is displayed in the picture.

So I liked the updates to download the latest version of the Amd page.

Hallo,

whenever i try an update for my r7 370 can help me. For more information, really load the 64Bit driver package ??

Sources:
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1724734
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1702719
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1704510
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1726487
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1721168
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1701080
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1706219
https://www.drwindows.de/windows-7-allgemein/106287-unterstuetzte-16-bit-anwendung.html
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1717738
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1699515
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1712822
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1697872
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1731829
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1655698
https://www.winboard.org/win8-software/200846-sammelthread-win8-unterstuetzte-software.html
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1723019
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1735287
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1719358
https://www.windows-7-forum.net/threads/nicht-unterstuetzte-aufloesung-einstellen.35837/
https://www.drwindows.de/windows-7-allgemein/78385-fehlermeldung-unterstuetzte-16bit-anwendung.html
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1657142