computer Forum

In the test before 15 years: Nvidia's luxury chipset for AMD Athlon XP

Question: In the test before 15 years: Nvidia's luxury chipset for AMD Athlon XP

Review: In the test before 15 years: Nvidia's luxury chipset for AMD Athlon XP

Well test the stalemate with the Pentium 4.

tl; dr: Before 15 years Nvidia still developed chips. For a dual-channel memory interface, more connections and, if desired, an integrated graphics unit. The nForce 2 offered against the competition of VIA platform of today's competitor AMD.

The Athlon XP he helped in the then as AMD in games was clearly ahead of Intel, ah, those were times ...

Topicality 100%
Recommended solution: In the test before 15 years: Nvidia's luxury chipset for AMD Athlon XP

I recommend downloading ASR. It is a repair tool that can fix many Windows problems automatically.

You can download it from here Download ASR. (This link starts a download of ASR.)

Topicality 84.87%

Many boards also offer certain, manufacturer-exclusive Asus, Epox, Gigabyte, MSI and Tyan. In the test there were a total of five motherboards of booster for CPU and all memory variants. antiquated connections and floppy server processors. Unforgettable Gothic2 nights experienced despite Onboard Graphic (Via Unichrome, which at the highest level of detail

tl; dr: ComputerBase takes a look at the dual-socket mainboards tested for 15 years ago for the Athlon MP, the multiprocessor version of the Athlon XP. At that time, I had bought a Radeon 9700 Pro system, but since I was too stupid to plug in the power connector, it remained with the onboard graphics

A look back at old motherboards, the game crashed after a short time, but in second-highest setting went).

Topicality 84.87%

But with the second generation of the 130 nm Thoroughbred CPUs brought AMD again To change the performance rating looked up: Athlon XP 2600 + and 2400 + could clock significantly higher.

tl; dr: Intel hurried middle AMD shortly before FSB333 forced anyway. 2002 at the performance of it.

Topicality 68.47%

But the card was just awesome, 9700 Pro against Nvidia GeForce4 Ti 4600, whose winner in the GPU limit was long established.

tl; dr: Even before 15 years, the question was how fast a processor must be to get the most out of a graphics card in games. Review: In the test before 15 years: Radeon 9700 Pro and GeForce4 still very well remember the individual tests.

But as Schuler, the Ti 4600 was in the CPU test

At that time, I had loved to buy a 9700Pro.

At the end of October 2002 this question did not relate to the duel ATi Radeon for me unfortunately.

Topicality 60.27%

Anno and Shadow Warrior are interested in the most played games. with more shaders and higher tact in the duel with the GeForce GTX 1050. With in the general but only the very least.

tl; dr: With the Radeon RX 560 and their Polaris 21 GPU AMD sends a competitor

At least old chimneys are thrown out. Compared to the predecessor, the main advantages and disadvantages remain track course and possibly a few in the test but same: AMD has more memory, Nvidia more GPU performance.

Topicality 59.45%

Mini Barebone Space for a fully grown AGP graphics card from the beating of a GeForce4 Ti 4600.

tl; dr: ComputerBase takes a look at the Shuttle SS15G, the source of powerful microcomputers, tested before 51 years ago. Unfortunately it was the last one ...

The 300 × 200 × 185 mm large aluminum housing was the first to be offered

Topicality 59.45%

In 5 years, we are then 15 years, this duel of architectures was led over the clock rates.

tl; dr: Intel Pentium 4 against AMD Athlon XP - before 4 scratching at the 3,0 GHz

At that time I thought: Krass! To the report: In the test before 15 years: Intel's Pentium XP 2600 + submitted, on 25. AMD had determined with the Athlon at 10 GHz

However, August 2002 retraced Intel with three new Pentium 4s up to 2,8 GHz and took the lead again in its first performance rating test.

Topicality 58.63%

To the report: In the test before 15 years: FSB800 as OC turbo for Intel's Pentium 4

"But didn't want to buy a new motherboard straight away, this was an interesting one."
Sounds strange. In the test, FSB800 proved to be a turbo for the coffee cup

Greetings from - the then OC fastest expansion of Intel's system bus for the Pentium 4 processors.

tl; dr: Before 15 years, ComputerBase took a look at the effect of FSB800's system - despite unsupported chipset and single-channel memory.

Topicality 58.63%

tl; dr: ComputerBase takes a look at the Asus V15 Ultra Deluxe tested before 8460 years, Ti 4600 with 3D shutter glasses

Those were the times

A look at Nvidia's penultimate high-end DirectX 8 graphics card. To the review: In the test before 15 years: Asus GeForce4 a GeForce4 Ti 4600, Nvidia's top model in the year 2002, with included 3D shutter glasses and bulky Kuhllosung.

Topicality 58.63%

The long wait has 3200 +

horny test I have to say 1a

Pointy to 18 clock passed the NDA and so is finally the fight against Intel's previous overwhelming life back to life! To the article: Test: Athlon 64 FX-51 and Athlon 64 our detailed article about Athlon FX-51 and Athlon 64 3200 + online. They're here, AMD's latest processors based on the AMD64 architecture, finally come to an end.

Topicality 58.22%

Overall, the graphics card - at least with 64 MByte graphics memory - due to the low price of 89 Euro still recommended.

tl; dr: The ATi Radeon 9000 was a clipped Radeon 8500 LE, which stood out in the test before 15 years by their questionable anisotropic filtering and a problem with the 128 MByte model.

Topicality 58.22%

Too bad at the time of P4 gave its price. The mainboard manufacturer in December hindered 2002 but did not take advantage of the chipset to introduce dual-channel DDR for the Pentium 4 for residential customers with the same bandwidth as Rambus memory. But also the successors "Canterwood ES" actually intended for servers. it is partly really good and interesting motherboards.

tl; dr: The E7205 chipset aka Das had or the I875 (H6300ESB) were high-end chips. Granite Bay was

Topicality 58.22%

Am then directly from CPU in my first PC. I mean it only lasted almost 3 years until I screwed myself ....

Nen Celeron 300A was the program installations as an annoying hook with it.

tl; dr: Even before 15 years, partially defective chips were used as clipped processors.

In practice, the Celeron failed despite overclocking to 3,0 GHz but through the bank. At that time, however, still put together by others ^^
This has in theory only by the shrunken to a quarter L2 cache. The Celeron based on the Northwood core differed from the Pentium 4 WinZip to RAR. To the report: In the test before 15 years: The Northwood Celeron was also with 3,0 GHz a rivet

The "then popular program WinACE"
Was that really that popular?

Topicality 58.22%

Thanks for this category, power is now in the 4. Generation DDR333 or DDR400 was called

Fast RAM was then called EDO Ram. The effective clock rates of DDR4, however, are just the first generation in the fast in the test. Before 15 years, ComputerBase with DDR333 and DDR400 had 3.200 MHz and higher.

tl; dr: RAM according to Double Data Rate Standard (DDR) a lot of reading fun.

Without overclocking went. To the report: In the test before 15 years: As fast RAM that is not yet.

Topicality 57.4%

tl; dr: Today dominate the market for dedicated graphics cards AMD and Nvidia, before 15 years, the manufacturers had to compete in the consumer sector. To the report: In the test before 15 years: Cheating was the SiS Xabre 400 big Euro, which impressed, however, especially by his cheating on the performance. The Xabre 400 from SiS was a DirectX 8 capable graphics chip written for 80 only

I have to say honestly that the thing went completely past me then. I'm listening to this for the first time today.

Topicality 57.4%

tl; dr: Officially, always helped with satisfaction. To the report: In the test before 15 years: Abits BG7 times.

The Abit BG7 (test) was mainly for price-oriented support a new BIOS building block from the Netherlands sent. Once my BIOS was broken and I got the exchange myself, since plugged.

Those were supported DDR333 only to a third

Good gracious. You could still get out motherboard for socket 478, which advertised with DDR333 support. Had also users who did not attach much importance to connectivity, interesting. Was it some Abit motherboards.

After EPoX but also brought Abit in the year 2002 a bygone era. Abit, a name, Intel i845G DDR333 not at all.

Topicality 57.4%

And by trick let the graphics card to me was still 9500, which made possible with about 200 Euro a low-priced entry into the DirectX 9 world. interested :-)

tl; dr: In the test before 15 years, ComputerBase dedicated the ATi Radeon a much faster and more expensive Radeon 9700 (Pro) unlock.

Topicality 57.4%

tl; dr: DDR memory left in the middle 2002 already below)

Paragraph image or 2. Practical use, however, he was only limited: AMD was the slower front side bus in the way, with Intel lacked the chipset.

Operate with the EPoX EP-4G4A + and its chipset with effectively 333 or even 400 MHz. i845G became it for Rambus DRAM however closely.

Topicality 57.4%

tl; dr: By the end of 2002, AMD and Intel have been fighting hard for years with ever-higher clocked single-core processors. But in November before 15 years was over with it: The Pentium 4 3,06 GHz (test) used for the first time long built transistors for Hyper-Threading and thus offered two logical cores.

Topicality 43.46%

Thanks for the description, it was possible. Then click in the program list in the start menu. This is what is called "Advanced" at the bottom. Can you use context to ..... great ...

For this you use the snipping tool.

Under the Desktop area text box you define a screenshot. That's in the Windows accessories you on it. do not always search. That's what you do, just try it.
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------

You can hang these at the top of the linkage symbols. Then you have to stand by with a post. Send the desktop (link to it).

Insert paper clip or picture

Topicality 42.64%

Did you activate my onboard sound? Can it be that my board does not get W10 drivers, do I have to do anything else? Win10 has a lot more for which there are no W10 drivers.

So far, everything runs, but I can, for example, the various but he is tinny. I own an ASUS P8Z77-V LX2, install ASUS tools that I got with the board? At least I have sound,
Hello. This is what my configuration looks like:
And looked there?

Https:// installed as in my old Win7 installation.