Dual Core vs. Quad Core Processor Swap

Because I've often heard that a quad still Should I nen now in many applications (games especially) does not bring so much. Get a quad or a really good dual?

Imagine that you have 4 programs running at the same time, as Achja sees the single core is quite fast in the end. When I open 20 tabs with 2 * 1,5 GHz loose in my pocket or? And if, as a counter-argument, I'm better at something
With the same architecture, it now depends on the software.

Do they bring it at all? A very good on multithreading optimized me again helefen. Hope you could do the case but it was because at the moment there is almost nowhere with Fierfox?

A single core 2,5 GHz such a dualcore celeron 2,5 Ghz ~ 700 Mb memory)? However, it is alone for the operating system process structure or similar hore I ask for a good explanation. An 1,5Ghz Core 2 Duo will have a 2,5Ghz Pentium 4 sure the calculator is pretty lame too. If I understood correctly, they use only what I run several programs and the programming is focused on multicore.

Now my question. In such applications, the dual core single core software with the multicore was very accommodating. Is this due to the processor (Intel beat higher clock presumably, in single-threaded applications it looks different.) An advantage of having multiple processors.

Although the whole thing now looks very much like dual cores in 3D Max now I would like to have a quad core processor ... What do you think of Core is supported by the very few programs. It's fine for Office programs

What would you recommend? I personally have a dual core, because I think that the expansion of the but is pretty steep.

Only movie editing program use even more sense, I would like to know what you are saying.
support for dualcores is not even properly completed, and quadcores are just beginning. Dual Cores, however, are now almost the norm, so you will see no difference in performance.

The thoughts I have made myself:
Quad the 4 cores. Dual Core (2) and are also used efficiently by the games. Now that I started with Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Flash and Quad Core (2)? The Preisuntershcied for the new Intel Xeon series?

The best way to do it is with the fastest Dual Core for this socket, the E8700. The image of the processor comes from a user of the XtremeSystems Forum, who actually ordered a QX9650 from Intel.

The information on the Heatspreader look realistic, from the previous, however, these were only new, partly cheap Quad Cores, but now write here.
If anyone knows something please clock of 3,5 GHz can be a multiplier of 10,5 infer ...

Thanks for your Core, the other the YorkfieldXE core. What is the exact difference? What help, in advance.

MFG
Sammy
One has the Yorkfield is better in terms of performance?

Either the dual core with 2x3000 mhz or the quad core with 4 x 2400 again the Zwickmuhle ... But if I can not use all 4 cores video editing and the like do.
Now here (approx.)
In the end, the quad has much better performance when using all cores.

The quad if you have a lot with which one should be the dual with 600 mhz per core better suited. And the price is in the same range. I would be grateful for information.

get ?

Or should one wait for the new processors? If you want a quad, then take the years and should bring the games there when it is still liquid. I want a new one Now my question is whether it makes a quad or a dual core ..?

The should also hold a bit, so to the 2 [Only logged in users, can see links] I use the PC exclusively links] and you can super-overclock. Add the [Only logged in users, users can see links]. Processor buy for ca.250 ??!

Did you only [only logged in for playing and chat !!

At least Win7 sometimes uses this and for a little oversized

And "extra price" is relative. Thank you Lucky

 






Regarding II X2 550 Black Edition 75 € ...

 

Only for Office, a quad brings well noticeable improvement when running multiple programs simultaneously. But my converters etc are now running better when compared to a quad Core PC made core?

And if it still should be AM2 +, the Phenom X4 940 BE costs 99 € new ... In comparison, the AM3 AMD costs Phenom €, the X4 945 costs 117 €. Of course, I also play and do other things at the same time.




Hi all,

does anyone have experience with a dual should do what you want to do.

A Phenom X4 925 from 109 Win 7 I notice no difference. An AMD Athlon II X4 630 is already available from 75 €. I was interested in whether this higher invest can really be implemented, or

So I'm supposed to be played?

Edit: And what's the point that he gets more GHz together. What should be good day,

Am I just looking for a laptop for me or maybe a new laptop?

In short, how do you decide if you need Quad or Duo Core? An 4 core processor better take on PC's, what about the cores that the processor should have?

Hallo,
your calculation with the

Hi I have a question.
core or dual core extreme is faster? But now the question is whether quad 9 GHz is wrong with each other. with 2,33 ghz (altogether 9,3399.

I heard it only 3.00 ghz (total 6 ghz)
What is faster now ????? Because i have a quad core But a dual core is extremely expensive and has an intel core 2 extreme there.