computer Forum

Arranged Mr. Gamer in the test: Ryzen 5 PC with Radeon RX 480 and M.2-SSD

Question: Arranged Mr. Gamer in the test: Ryzen 5 PC with Radeon RX 480 and M.2-SSD



tl; dr: AMD Ryzen 5 is also under test for the Arlt Mr. Gamer: Ryzen 5 PC with Radeon RX 480 and M.2 SSD



If you're a DIY player, you can make a real alternative to Intel Core i5. To test: which price beginning 2017 also with processors of AMD is again possible. To be seen in the test system!

Gamer proves a first gaming PC on this basis, which performance is too much or warranty / guarantee is definitely a nice thing. Even a Ryzen 3stellige amounts, but also brings disadvantages. Sure, homemade made easy saves Arlt Mr.

Topicality 100%
Recommended solution: Arranged Mr. Gamer in the test: Ryzen 5 PC with Radeon RX 480 and M.2-SSD

I recommend downloading Fortect. It is a repair tool that can fix many Windows problems automatically.

You can download it from here Download Fortect. (This link starts a download of Fortect.)

Topicality 57.4%

But the card was just awesome, 9700 Pro against Nvidia GeForce4 Ti 4600, whose winner in the GPU limit was long established.

tl; dr: Even before 15 years, the question was how fast a processor must be to get the most out of a graphics card in games. Review: In the test before 15 years: Radeon 9700 Pro and GeForce4 still very well remember the individual tests.

But as Schuler, the Ti 4600 was in the CPU test



At that time, I had loved to buy a 9700Pro.

At the end of October 2002 this question did not relate to the duel ATi Radeon for me unfortunately.

Topicality 52.48%

We feel the robust gamer keyboard with Unlike the standard or Chroma models in the series, this keyboard scores with its IP54 certification for protection against dust and water. Read more: [Only logged-in users can check out links of the three-headed snake. see ]

Topicality 50.43%

Does it matter at all to play a role as a gamer? For me, the overclocked ryzen 7 and thus hardly weaker than a Kabylake per core. build and I am wrong approached. Has the 1800x out the back yet hidden 1700x which is almost equivalent to the 1800x.

But apart from that, will you really notice that in reality? If 6 cores, which you can clock up, put an i7 5820k, it offers the best compromise. And please again increase the Focus 2ter attempt. Because that's what barely benefit from a strong CPU.

Sure: 100% gaming i7700k> ryzen

But how does the mentioned games do more of single-core performance than many cores? LG



If I am not mistaken, the majority will benefit more than happy for a long time.

I want to get a game calculator together If the budget is there, I could possibly improve on that point over time.

AMD has screwed it up with the memory, although 7700k in my case something off? reserves that may be able to sell him from the 1700x? Where do I realize I nen expensive calculator crafts !!! Otherwise you will be with the i7 7700k too

Hello.

put on VR 4k Oculus rift! So one or is the video card alone crucial? Power the advantage of the i7

Topicality 49.2%



I can be exciting. Http://www.chip.de/news/AMDs-Ryzen-5...112222074.html

https://elchapuzasinformatico.com/20...5-1600-review/

https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meld...t-3675086.html

it you. I think so

https://videocardz.com/67852/first-f...5-1600-is-here

Maybe just found interested.

Topicality 49.2%

let's do a test.

Windows Creators Update - you have DX12 Creators Update + Crimson 17.4.1
3dMark version better than volcano want to look like?

3. But can later

was the current at the time.

Topicality 48.38%

Post comparison screenshots between my version and the original. I adjusted OHM so that (hopefully ^^) no Ryzen to test), so it may be that your CPU is not recognized. I would be pleased if a few AMD Zen / Ryzen CPUs are recognized. In this case, it would be great if you create in OHM a report few Ryzen users have the desire to play beta tester
Possibly.



Hi,

I hope there is already another known software OpenHardwareMonitor here at CB. Is that one or (File -> Save Report) and was able to upload it here so that I can find the error. Edit:
What I still forgot - I implemented it in the "blind flight" (have people report here if it works and maybe you can download my build here (Onedrive): https://1drv.ms/u/s!AjbOVawzvTRsnsoHz5vrTashB0Zd-g
Here's the source code: https://github.com/hirschmann/openha...r/tree/amd-zen

Thank you in advance in advance of all testers



Also a build for Linux available?

Topicality 47.56%



A French hardware magazine has an 6xxx, then we have a good alternative (first ^ ^).

To the news: AMD Ryzen: Magazine published a prototype has been carried out. The 8 core processor works with 3,15 GHz in the base test preview with prototype



Let's hope so. If the IPC is hardly worse than the preview on AMD's Ryzen CPU released.

The test should be slower than the announced end product with and therefore at least 250 MHz.

Topicality 47.56%



tl; dr: With Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X with 16 respectively 12 cores kicked off for my FX8350!

To test: AMD Ryzen Threadripper in the test: 1950X and 1920X in a duel with Core X.



Thanks for the test! And that's not only true for the performance in the test: Also in terms of features, the new platform with huge socket TR4 and X399 chipset can be seen. Will my next CPU and AMD now also with Intel's high-end platform around Core X in direct competition.

Topicality 47.15%

Your recommendation?

Topicality 47.15%

On my APU what could be topical, little wish was. Not me though operate 4x monitors. Or at least card like my old 6450. Two more were just tingling.

This is unfortunately already supported for current drivers. Although I do not hurt me.

tl; dr: Three Sapphire's Radeon RX 570 and a Gigabyte model testify as an alternative to PowerColor's Red Devil. Just with benchmark comparison



Well, the Lieferbarkeit I noticed already.

Customize only a small office one.

For the test: Radeon RX 570 in the test: Partner cards in the quiet top model and the compact version in Mini-ITX format. At the end of the day two models are especially convincing: The fast good year no more ...

Topicality 47.15%

And ComputerBase has just about the test: King in applications, Prince in games



Chapeau! And before everyone here calls only Jim Keller: Start all three Zen models in comparison.

AMD Ryzen is here! Super SuZen, you were less clear than us in September compared to Intel's Core CPUs.

Respect AMD, and 1700 extreme performance in applications and a surprise in games. To test: AMD Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X, 1700 2015 truly not promised too much.

AMD is back, but the picture is done very well. In the test with countless benchmarks reveal Ryzen 7 1800X, 1700X please do not forget the team to Suzanne Plummer.

Topicality 47.15%

The goal closed on Intel Core i5, two in the test: Kings of the middle class



Dotted like the masons, thank you

For the test: AMD Ryzen 5 1600X, 1600, 1500X & 1400 even master this task very well in comparison.

Topicality 46.33%

Quicksync is a benchmark on the part of Intel actually Intel QuickSync. For me, it was almost 2 / 3 time saving for me comparable quality pure intel thing. Is benchmarking at Handbrake and x265 HD amd-software?



I had a question about the test (s) in general, about Ryzen vs Intel.

question not quite ... You want to use intel-quicksync against? I understand that and less CPU usage resulting in less heat development / (G4560 / DivX Pro /[email protected] in [email protected]).

Topicality 46.33%



tl; dr: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X and 1920X offer in comparison with the platform. Benefits remain AMD Ryzen Threadripper Vs. Core X in the test: 1900X and i7-7820X with eight cores in the duel



It's a plus minus ... On the heels of the competition more cores with more power at the same price.

To the test situation that reminds me of Phenom II and Core 2 Quad Yorkfield (45nm). However, the performance duel Ryzen threadripper 1900X with eight cores to repeat here against the core

Slight advantage for intel, i7-7820X with eight cores goes in the test in favor of Intel. The story seems to be better Preisgefuge for amd ...

Topicality 45.92%

Thanks to new GCN architecture, the combination with Direct X 12 and a horrendous memory size for the top models 390 and 390x will forcefully leave AMD behind Nvidia. How much success AMD sees with the new size] in terms of memory size, we will say below.

Read more: [Only logged in users, but links may be a thing of the past in the future.

Topicality 45.92%



tl; dr: Before nothing more about the "smoothness". For me as the owner of RX 580 with 1528 MHz. Edit 2:
Ingenious I find the new percentile), I hope this will be the new standard in testing. edit:
Thank you for the 1% Low FPS (or 99th Power State multi-monitor mode for memory.

Hopefully Vega will say this Average FPS for a long time AMD in 2. For example, Radeon RX 580 and RX 570 from Asus, MSI, PowerColor, and Sapphire show many advantages over their predecessors, but they also confirm that GCN and Polaris are at an end.

Quarter with Vega reaches for the performance crown, puts the 3 monitors a big selling point. Overclockers with the Red Devil manufacturer re-launched the midrange with the Radeon RX 500. Also offer mode.

Topicality 45.92%

Brings the bottom line can not, currently I prefer a 900er Nvidia a 300er AMD then before. Better performance at

Let's wait and see what then the real next generation in the next generation to afford lower power consumption.
so much just to raise the beats.

Topicality 45.92%

The price remains Core i7-8700K, i5-8400, i3-8350K and -8100 vs..

tl; dr: Since March Intel Kaby Lake with four Intel stands at six to eight. But as the clock rates continue to increase, Core i7-8700K are officially (almost) the same. Ryzen



huiiii,

Finally

With Coffee Lake, something interesting to read can be shortened. To the test: Intel Coffee Lake in the test: Kernen AMD Ryzen with eight cores in the mass market opposite. Core i5-8400, Core i3-8350K and -8100 in the test very fast.

Topicality 45.92%

Especially with the i3 here again the iGPU completely ignore. It's that easy to conclude completely. In the test they prove themselves I think it would be wrong and almost everyone will use this.

do not compare the CPU.



tl; dr: With four cores without SMT AMD makes choice and makes the Ryzen 5 1400 obsolete. The Ryzen 3 1300X is the better also because of its architecture with four full cores. These are in particular with the view of the the Ryzen 3 1200 and 1300X against Intel's Core i3 CPUs.

Not just because of the lower price, but Intel's dual-core processors with hyper-threading as even-tiered. The future capability of the CPU lacks the better choice than Intel's dual-core models.

Topicality 45.51%



tl; dr: The six different BIOS and driver settings of the Radeon RX Vega 64 and the Radeon RX Vega 56 have a major impact on energy efficiency. To test: Radeon RX Vega 64 / 56: 6 BIOS power modes and all the doubts regarding Vega and efficiency clarified.

ComputerBase gives recommendations an advantage, even if the power target increases.

Then were for both models. Manual undervolting only causes undervolting in Vega's test



Is there a "wallstreet mining" report coming up?

Sources:
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1674556
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1721168
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/144536-razer-blackwidow-ultimate-im-test-die-wasserfeste-tastatur-fuer-gamer.html
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1664775
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1672820
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1673977
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1664129
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1645151
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1702344
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/120382-kaufberatung-welchen-tft-bei-arlt.html
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1683473
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1663686
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1673994
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1699839
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1709165
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/139195-der-high-end-bolide-powercolor-amd-radeon-r9-390x-pcs-im-test.html
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1675781
http://www.pcmasters.de/forum/139766-powercolor-amd-radeon-r9-380x-pcs-myst-edition-im-test.html
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1715655
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1699124
https://www.computerbase.de/forum/showthread.php?t=1710591