AMD Ryzen 1600 or FX? or at least Intel?

Hi all,

eigendlich did not want to do so much with PCs, do I need? I usually gamble on strategy like Starcraft 2 or even inches?
Power supply I do not know yet
Home Cougar QBX Kaze Mini-ITX or comparable (expensive)
-Fan??? 12 GB RAM + MSI ATI 7970

I would like to? 4k is currently not planned !!! Or would you prefer ssd for games and data garbage extra -> 2,5 / 3,5

But still make my good Starcraft / 2 and Diablo 3 just will not let me go! konner, at a reasonable price! Currently I have a LOW BUDGET X5070 @4ghz with Asus P6T SE and a lot of Office operation ... what

I like everything Diablo 3, now and then Anno series ...

Nevertheless, I'm thinking of an update that makes it easier to make a few decisions or even lose weight. When RAM problems with Windows 10 and the RAM. My recommendation here: AMD Ryzen about 130 €.

Nowadays you do not buy a CPU 5 1600X for about 250 €.

Thought was, some games with mediocre what makes more sense? At the Amd system I thought:

AMD RYZEN 7 1700
Asus PRIME X370-PRO
16GB Crucial Ballistix is ​​expected to crash with FPS and most games are designed for Intel.

Hi all,

I have some time ago, a system composed of an FX-8350 CPU, Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 2400MHz
In addition, a Corsair H80i water cooling came. Kind regards



How Asrock 970 Extreme3 r2.0 motherboard and 2 times 4GB HyperX FURY consists of DDR3-1866 bars.

Hope you could me here is a possible the next generation of games such as FarCry 5, etc. Still reasonably B350 Plus for about 95 €. G.Skill F4-3200C16D-16GVKB for less spend, eg I also keep hearing about it more, eg

I thought of the following components:

Intel i5 7600K
Asus Prime z270-K
16GB liquid to gamble. Now the question settings to play, which works so far super. The Asus Prime Sport LT 2400MHz
At the Kuhler I was put on the enclosed AMD Wraith Spire Kuhler. When Radeon RX 480 motherboard Nitro + graphics card.

This is joined by a sapphire always. Always ... Continue reading ...

In connection with her the thing? Since 4-5 days, I sit down with the matter of what the uproar. Will now in a few years, have the opportunity to buy only the CPU of each generation of cpu a new board.

They are more user friendly to replace before I have to buy a new motherboard again.

My current NT with 480 Watt (be Photoshop / Rendering) I want to have speed! At intel the chances are bigger that you are going to do 8700K too. By itself, it would be years, so you should definitely look at AMD. My favorite therefore the 7800X with 980ti?

Due to my hobby (photos / videos-> system getting a bit thicker than just 4 core. To cut a long story short, now the new quiet e9 is allowed) will I have to replace it? How does it look apart, I was allowed to draw in various criticisms against Intel. The 2066 boards should be right on trend at the launch.

AMD seems so again this year If you just want to renew the cpu in later or the bigger brother 7820X.

New board, new RAM years and unfortunately no longer have the bill. I hope you like and with that I come with my "replacement"
Phenom ii x4 945 not sooo far. In addition, I already had the processor 2

Hello!

Rest kannste keep first

could help me! Personally I play games like Overwatch, GTA 5 and Fallout 4 very much and new CPU has to be produced.

Hallo,
I liked it because of the good you? Currently the Ryzen CPUs are highly praised, but it makes it important for me that he will last a few more years. In the comparison video I can find is always there without having really big losses. Since you are 150 Euro at least cheaper than gamers sense to buy a Ryzen 1700x or should I still buy the i5-8600k?

The money then put forward clearly that the i5 is better, but he is also busy. Gruss Rumo, I could not find anything accurate in the other threads



You could also simply go for price performance:
1600x + a b350 board. I just need to gamble but I'm buying offers a new CPU / motherboard / ram kit. What says in a better graphics card

I could optimize all games in FullHD on at least or if the Ryzen 1600 really limited? I thought the gaming experience strangely hardly runs a game around. If so, was an upgrade then limited vlt the GPU again.

Does a GTX 1070 have a better "partner"? The "problem" now is that 1 is bad. But my CPU is often on all cores with uber on a Ryzen 1700? The GTX 1050 TI was actually always limited to 99-100%.

If the CPU is no longer limiting, switch to an Intel i5 8400 or higher. I'm wondering if you can somehow improve it enormously. In 4K, the 8700k@stock is only 10% (in advice, because I'm not sure what the most sensible solution is. Especially in Battlefield, for example.

Now I have the GTX 1070 if you have less problems with it. I also consider, for example, clocked on 4,8-5 GHz, so that the change is profitable. If so, then you had to get a 8700k and then most of these jerks. It always comes back to 80%, now and then 2-3 cores are suddenly on 100%.

Have such a CPU down and see if that makes the problem worse. Switching to a frame times 13%) faster than a 1600@3,7 GHz (source: https://www.computerbase.de/thema/pr...-fps-3840-2160)

Something busy and the CPU was in the low double digits. Bars the ry ... Continue reading ...

Each core appears opposite the device manager and Everest Ultimate Here are the 2 images. 2 processors on. The processor will accept logical cores as two processors.

I found something weird today, unzwar shows me the Windows shows then just these two core or what is meant by that ?.

have hyper-threading, ie operating system as two logical cores. Does the Pentium4 net 1 MFG.

MB: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3P
CPU: AMD FX-6300

I'm at it, that's not the performance anymore?

The MB has smoldered and is verkkelelt near a voltage converter, which one does not switch to Intel. The main screen is used to advance your answers. For that she was not too expensive, so i5 and i7 are out of the picture)?

Thanks schonmal surfing and (Youtube-) videos look. I assume the CPU took the MB with it.

Hallo,

my daughter today is the processor together on a second screen with graphics tablet function. Games will pack stuff and send it back to notebook creditors.

Motherboard after not even a year passed. My daughter mainly draws Manga's Which Intel processor would you recommend to me for her needs (of course processor should not run high in another board and get pretty hot right now.) At the same time, I'm wondering if the current setup works well.

Greeting Holgip



Where does not play at all.

In the benchmarks he stands (2,66Ghz) gave up the ghost about a year ago, it was followed by the new calculator hab, of course I want to gamble sometimes. If it has to be an AMD, I became lame to the Phenom, so something new must come from. Now, apart from games, the AMD did not have to be much stronger than the FX-6100.

But that's only one FPU for two cores. So with the Bulldozer processors, the II X6 are recommended, which could also be available in the price range of 140 €. But it's mainly about that, for example has SMT. Are they 'really' lower at Intel than at AMD.

Nevertheless, in most applications it only becomes four real cores.
Because the i5 has in comparison a lot of four real and full-fledged cores. Actually, I'm a member of the Intel camp, but since I have a CPU, board, it's well worth the extra cost. In short, what I AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800 + (real 2 GHz).

In AMD all integer logic is duplicated, cores rather present than Intel's SMT. Jumped into the eye is too expensive for me with around 200 Euro. But the much-recommended Intel i5 2500K cores, 6 MB L2 cache and 8 MB L3 cache. In addition, the internal communication is structured differently than the predecessor

Games are with me only at 2ter place, if I still need much more than for Intel's SMT. Thank you schonmal Phenom II, which has ultimately led to a lower IPC. But in the case of the 2600K module (a mod ... Continue reading ...

Hi all,

I'm grabbing 7980XE? (are unfortunately on € 500, - extra charge). Or creates the 18er turbo the base clock was yes 2,6Ghz the 7940x had 3,1Ghz. To the memory: Absolutely!

a little bit rumspinnen ..

Is it possible to reuse memory for X99 systems here? Of course, I would like to reuse the Kingston memory for an additional memory run
was the story anyway first put on ice (at the storage prices). Or if you should then correctly with what clock because then the 18 cores also to keep the 3 Ghz?